How many words should a discussion be




















About The Author. Kevin O'Gorman. Related Posts. Leave a reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Sauaia, A. Lund Research Ltd. The Writing Center. Writing the Discussion. Writing in Psychology course syllabus. University of Florida; Yellin, Linda L. A Sociology Writer's Guide. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Interpretation is a subjective exercise. As such, you should always approach the selection and interpretation of your findings introspectively and to think critically about the possibility of judgmental biases unintentionally entering into discussions about the significance of your work.

With this in mind, be careful that you do not read more into the findings than can be supported by the evidence you have gathered. Remember that the data are the data: nothing more, nothing less. MacCoun, Robert J. Don't Write Two Results Sections!

One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the interpretation of those results and their significance in relation to the research problem, not the data itself.

Azar, Beth. Avoid Unwarranted Speculation! The discussion section should remain focused on the findings of your study. For example, if the purpose of your research was to measure the impact of foreign aid on increasing access to education among disadvantaged children in Bangladesh, it would not be appropriate to speculate about how your findings might apply to populations in other countries without drawing from existing studies to support your claim or if analysis of other countries was not a part of your original research design.

If you feel compelled to speculate, do so in the form of describing possible implications or explaining possible impacts. Be certain that you clearly identify your comments as speculation or as a suggestion for where further research is needed.

The Discussion. Search this Guide Search. Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper Offers detailed guidance on how to develop, organize, and write a college-level research paper in the social and behavioral sciences. The Abstract Executive Summary 4. The Introduction The C. The Discussion Limitations of the Study 9. The Conclusion Appendices Definition The purpose of the discussion section is to interpret and describe the significance of your findings in relation to what was already known about the research problem being investigated and to explain any new understanding or insights that emerged as a result of your research.

Usually, no limit set for the number of references by institutions as it depends on the literature available on a certain topic. However, you should not miss any research study, research paper in your subject area. You need to authenticate and the latest references to back your hypothesis, to state the significance and need of your research topic.

Also, you need to journals, books, research papers, articles published previously for your literature review chapter. A to Z of Research Proposal Writing. View all posts by Albert Barkley. How to Organize Your Dissertation Structure? Table of Contents. The team, which comprises subject matter experts, academicians, trainers, and technical project managers, are passionate about helping researchers at all levels establish a successful career, both within and outside academia.

How to Draft the Acknowledgment Section of a Manuscript. Abstract vs. Introduction: Do You Know the Difference? Annex vs. Appendix: Do You Know the Difference? Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:. We hate spam too.

We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you. Discussion Vs. Reading time 4 minutes.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000